Val Lee's Weblog

Val Lee's Writings

Muslims Terrorists (Chechens) Bomb Moscow—March 29, 2010 (“Recent reports indicate that the Uzbecks, Chechens and Uighurs trained in Al Qaeda training camps in North Waziristan have started moving towards their home bases to step up jihad against those countries and to disrupt the movement of logistic supply to the US and other NATO troops.”)

Obama from 2007 speech, “In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans have a more urgent quality,” Obama wrote. “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

The world requires the intercessions of true believers:

Sadness plagues our globe that is regulated to a large degree by the sinister world. The Christian’s enemies are the world, the flesh and the devil. The world, though under the ultimate control of Jesus Christ, is being allowed to walk its own path in greater grievous ways as flawless apocalyptic texts predicted.

We must rejoice in the freedoms we possess this day in the US and pray regarding those that may be lost to us tomorrow. Most Christians are no longer the salt of the earth, being they no longer stand on the Word of God in its totality. Salt irritates sin for repentance sake.

With the ceasing of strong preaching against all that is contrary to the Word of God, our nation is dwindling swiftly. Hebrews 12:4—For the Word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword; piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart.

Val Lee


Czar Van Jones was forced to resign due to political unveiling.

The truth: “He sympathized with Islamic terrorists blackening our collective eye. The day after the attacks, in fact, he led a candlelight vigil in Oakland expressing solidarity with Arabs and Muslims and other “victims of U.S. Imperialism around the world.”

Obama’s 9/11 Prism By: Paul Sperry | Friday, September 11, 2009


The ouster of White House green czar Van Jones, exposed as a 9/11 “Truther,” raises a larger national-security question as we mark the 8th anniversary of the worst foreign attack on U.S. Soil. What does the commander-in-chief really think about 9/11?

We now know what his erstwhile special adviser thinks, and of course it’s deeply unsettling. Jones, an Ivy League lawyer-turned-community organizer, signed a petition circulated by leftist conspiracy nuts suggesting a government role in the 2001 terror attacks.

Before he thought 9/11 was an inside job, he sympathized with Islamic terrorists blackening our collective eye. The day after the attacks, in fact, he led a candlelight vigil in Oakland expressing solidarity with Arabs and Muslims and other “victims of U.S. Imperialism around the world.”

He was heavily recruited by the White House, photographed with the president. He shares the same Marxism-steeped ideology preached by President Obama’s longtime minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

It’s worth revisiting what Obama’s preacher thinks about 9/11, as his thinking echoes Jones’ thinking. And as we’ll see further on, it appears to have influenced that of Wright’s top acolyte, who is now in the White House running a war on terror he refuses to even call “war,” against an enemy he refuses to even call “terrorists,” let alone the more accurate “Islamic extremists” or “jihadists.”

(Interestingly, Jones in the same black magazine interview condemned the War on Terror as a “racist war” against “people of color.” He compared it to the War on Drugs — a “secret war against a secret enemy with brown skin, an enemy that’s both within the country and outside of the country.”)

Excerpts of Wright’s sermon have been widely reported. What hasn’t been reported is that, just days before he gave it, Wright personally witnessed the second plane hit the World Trade Center from a hotel window near Newark, N.J., where he happened to be staying that fateful day.

He was an eyewitness to the carnage. Yet five days later, he tried to coldly justify it to his flock by calling it an act of “revenge” by an oppressed “people of faith” who “moved from the hatred for armed enemies to the hatred of unarmed innocents.”

“I and others who lost family members on 9/11 are acutely aware of this stuff,” Debra Burlingame, sister of the pilot killed in the American Airlines Flight 77 hijacking, told me. “It hits us particularly hard.”

A former Nation of Islam follower, Wright takes sick joy in the murder of thousands of fellow Americans as a much-deserved punishment for America not only supporting Israel in an anti-Palestinian “apartheid,” as he calls it, but for enslaving Africans.

Jones said much the same thing in a press statement released on 9/11 by his Marxist group STORM, or Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement:

“Ordinary people in the United States can best deter future attacks by insisting that the U.S. government abandon its oppressive role of keeping down workers and dominating poor nations around the world. Increasingly, safety at home will require justice abroad … All people and especially African-Americans [and other minorities] must stand in solidarity with our Arab and Muslim brothers.”

Obama said something eerily similar in a 2007 speech to Americans in Iowa: “If we are less respected in the world, then you will be less safe.” And in his most recent memoir, he seemed to embrace Jones’ call for solidarity with Arabs and Muslims. “In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans have a more urgent quality,” Obama wrote. “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

Obama has tapped another 9/11 apologist as a senior policy adviser. His National Security Council aide Samantha Power is part of the blame-America crowd. She thinks America was attacked because we back “abusive regimes” in the Middle East. She also thinks 9/11 was a dose of good medicine, since the mass slaughter helped “Americans empathize with the victims of genocide” in Africa and other Third World regions. (Power’s radical husband Cass Sunstein also landed a White House job. He’s now Obama’s regulations czar.)

President Obama’s Czar Cass Sunstein on First Amendment from Wikipedia:

In his book Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech Sunstein says there is a need to reformulate First Amendment law. He thinks that the current formulation, based on Justice Holmes’ conception of free speech as a marketplace “disserves the aspirations of those who wrote America’s founding document.”[13] The purpose of this reformulation would be to “reinvigorate processes of democratic deliberation, by ensuring greater attention to public issues and greater diversity of views.”[14] He is concerned by the present “situation in which like-minded people speak or listen mostly to one another,”[15] and thinks that in “light of astonishing economic and technological changes, we must doubt whether, as interpreted, the constitutional guarantee of free speech is adequately serving democratic goals.”[16] He proposes a “New Deal for speech [that] would draw on Justice Brandeis’ insistence on the role of free speech in promoting political deliberation and citizenship.”

Cass Sunstein on marriage from Wikipedia:

In a recent book, Sunstein proposes that government recognition of marriage be discontinued. “Under our proposal, the word marriage would no longer appear in any laws, and marriage licenses would no longer be offered or recognized by any level of government,” argues Sunstein. He continues, “the only legal status states would confer on couples would be a civil union, which would be a domestic partnership agreement between any two people.” He goes on further, “Governments would not be asked to endorse any particular relationships by conferring on them the term marriage,” and refers to state-recognized marriage as an “official license scheme.”


Sunstein’s views on marriage is disquieting, as this institution was ordained by God who states, in Hebrews 13:4, in the Bible, “Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is undefiled; fornicators and adulterers God will judge.”

Mark Lloyd: The Next Obama Czar to Fall?

Friday, 11 Sep 2009 01:16 PM


By: David A. Patten

Embattled FCC “diversity czar” Mark Lloyd, who praised strongman Hugo Chavez for his “incredible” attainment of a “democratic revolution” in Venezuela, was handpicked for his tailor-made job by the same top Obama adviser who played a similar role in the elevation of former “green-jobs czar” Van Jones, according to media reports. Jones resigned Saturday after several inflammatory statements and the disclosure of his involvement in the “9/11 truther” movement, which contends the Bush administration was somehow complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks.

The American Spectator’s Washington Prowler blog reports that “several White House sources” are confirming Jones was appointed over the objections of the White House Counsel’s Office, which found “inconsistencies” in Jones’ application materials.

Valerie Jarrett, one of President Obama’s closest friends and advisers, reportedly played a key role in supporting the appointments of both Jones and Lloyd.

Lloyd, a former network broadcaster and communications attorney, is now taking serious fire for the radical stances he took prior to his appointment to the FCC. President Obama’s heavy reliance on special advisers or “czars” to help him steer the federal bureaucracy has been widely criticized as extra-constitutional by Republicans and some Democrats.

Since his appointment, Lloyd has been a lightning rod for criticism from conservatives worried that, based on his past statements and writings, Lloyd will use “diversity” as a back door method of imposing Fairness Doctrine-style regulations aimed at muzzling conservative broadcasters.

In a July 2007 essay titled “Forget the Fairness Doctrine,” Lloyd wrote of “the failure of the supposed ‘free market’ regulation of the U.S. radio industry to address the public-interest needs of listeners. Our analysis revealed that conservative talk radio dominates the airwaves of our country — to the detriment of informed public discourse and the First Amendment.”

It was the president’s appointment of a special FCC adviser who blames conservative talkers for distorting the nation’s political dialog that created the talk-show furor.

Lloyd’s has made controversial statements regarding Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez as well —stating that he finds aspects of Chavez’s consolidation of power in Venezuela admirable. As a panelist at last year’s National Conference for Media Reform, Lloyd remarked that Chavez engineered “really an incredible revolution, a Democratic revolution, to begin to put in place saying that we’re going to have impact on the people of Venezuela.”

The apparently laudatory statements about Chavez have drawn sharp criticism, in part because Chavez has imposed a broad government crackdown on any media outlets that dared to exercise their independence.

In July, for example, The New York Times reported that the Chavez regime was revoking the broadcast licenses of over 200 radio stations and imposing stringent new regulations on cable outlets in Venezuela.

“With all due respect,” former Bush administration senior adviser Karl Rove stated… With all due respect . . . does the president believe that Venezuela is the model that we ought to achieve in American media?!”

Lloyd’s dim view of how corporate news-media ownership influences political dialog is evident in his 2006 book “Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy”:

He hails government as “the only mechanism that can help us improve our society” (page 15).

He states that allowing private companies to operate telegraph systems in the 19th century represented a “government abdication of a responsibility,” adding, “The most powerful communications tool was deliberately placed in the hands of one faction in our republic: commercial industry . . . The failure of market-driven journalism and the failure of democratic politics are both related to the structural fault created by this and subsequent political decisions — decisions deep within the American system, asleep under the rubble of history” (page 15).

Motley adds: “It’s communism in the communications field, it’s state ownership of the means of production . . . you’re producing on-air content, and he wants the state to do that. He’s a frightening dude.”

Loudon predicts the Obama administration will react aggressively against further revelations on the “czars,” because the more they’re exposed the more Obama’s true ideological leanings become evident.


(1 John 5:10-13—the Bible) paradise

March 30, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Israel, News, Uncategorized, White House | | Leave a comment

News March 24, 2010—Jerusalem Rioting

Jerusalem Targeted Again

Video of rioting in Jerusalem! Palestinians want Jerusalem removed: (It is being stated that if you truly want the news as it is, check British sources. Reuters appears to be quite good.)

Pray for peace in Israel. Someday Christ will rule the world from Jerusalem. In the future, Jews will receive Christ as their Savior. (Zechariah Chapter 14)

“And once again it is the target of Muslim attempts to exterminate the Jewish presence in Jerusalem. Yet Obama, who accuses Israel of frustrating the ‘peace process’ by building in east Jerusalem by agreement with his own administration, is silent over this inflammatory and disgusting Palestinian attack on a Jewish place of worship. It would seem that for Obama ‘peace’ means the surrender of Israel to Arab violence.”

“Precisely. Middle America, those millions of mainly Christian souls who are Israel’s staunchest supporters in the world, should be made aware of what their President is doing – turning the United States into a betrayer of democracy, human rights and the Jewish people to become no less than an accessory to terror.”

Thursday, March 18, 2010
The Obama Intifada?

Are we seeing the beginning (heaven forbid) of the Obama intifada?

The escalating Arab rioting today in Jerusalem and the West Bank is undoubtedly being stoked up by the fact that the Obama administration has turned so viciously against Israel. Doubtless as a result the Arabs now smell victory within their grasp and may now unleash another wave of violence against Israelis.

Every single one of their recent ‘grievances’ is not just fabricated but stands history and justice on their heads. The ostensible cause of today’s rioting, the re-opening yesterday of the ancient Hurva synagogue in the heart of the Jewish quarter of Jerusalem’s Old City, is a typical example of this fanatical moral and historical inversion. The Hurva has been under reconstruction for years. The Palestinian campaign of incitement over it carries the message that Jews cannot build places of worship in their own city. And before anyone says any of Jerusalem is ‘occupied Palestinian territory’, it is not and never was ‘Palestinian’. In every single attempt to resolve the Middle East impasse, Jerusalem was always regarded as a special case on its own; and from the mid 19th century onwards it has had uninterruptedly a Jewish majority.

The Hurva synagogue has been rebuilt, moreover, because it was twice destroyed by Muslims. Its history, as recounted by Leo Rennert, is testimony both to the uninterrupted presence of Jews in Jerusalem and to the uninterrupted attempts by Muslims to remove that presence…

The first synagogue on the site was built in 1701. Jews had obtained a loan for its construction from Muslims. But Jerusalem’s Jewish community, mired in poverty, couldn’t repay the debt, so Muslim creditors destroyed the synagogue.

But Jewish residents, with some outside help, rebuilt the Hurva and turned it into a magnificent landmark…that is, until 1948, when less than two weeks after Israel declared independence, Jordanian forces moved into the Old City and destroyed the Hurva — with only the great arch left as a reminder of its former glory. And so it remained for six decades. From 1948 until 1967, Jews were barred by Jordan from even approaching the Hurva ruins, just as they were barred from praying at the Western Wall. After Israel captured the Old City in 1967, the Hurva Arch stood for many years as a stark reminder of a sad chapter in Jewish history.

Then a meticulous rebuilding and renovation effort was begun several years ago. It culminated on March 15, 2010 in the official reopening of the Hurva as an exact replica of the 19th-century synagogue, including the surviving Arch, which is now a permanent part of the new Hurva. Henceforth, it won’t just be a dramatic reminder of the past; it will resume its age-old function as a place of worship.

And once again it is the target of Muslim attempts to exterminate the Jewish presence in Jerusalem. Yet Obama, who accuses Israel of frustrating the ‘peace process’ by building in east Jerusalem by agreement with his own administration, is silent over this inflammatory and disgusting Palestinian attack on a Jewish place of worship. It would seem that for Obama ‘peace’ means the surrender of Israel to Arab violence.

As former New York mayor Ed Koch has said, the pressure the US is now bringing to bear upon Israel is unforgivable. It is an astonishing demonstration of cynicism and malicious intent. Noah Pollak says that Obama is trying to get rid of Netanyahu by pushing him into a corner. But much worse still, Obama’s deliberate decision to escalate what was at most a tactless but minor diplomatic blunder by Israel makes America an accessory to the violence that is now taking place and may get worse. Even this Ha’aretz writer thinks so:

But perhaps what is most important is this: Palestinians see the Obama administration’s decision to attack Israel as an invitation to adopt a more confrontational line. A previous settlement slowdown led Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to exploit the opportunity and make any new negotiations conditional on a total freeze in construction, including in east Jerusalem…

Precisely. Middle America, those millions of mainly Christian souls who are Israel’s staunchest supporters in the world, should be made aware of what their President is doing – turning the United States into a betrayer of democracy, human rights and the Jewish people to become no less than an accessory to terror.


Palestinians want the Jews destroyed:

(1 John 5:10-13—the Bible)   paradise

March 24, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Israel, Uncategorized | , | Leave a comment

President Obama’s Pro Sex offender Judicial Nominee

Dear Readers,

I would like to inform you regarding Judge David Hamilton who our president desires to appoint to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

This man is dreadfully vile, and wicked! He uplifts the unlawful position to change our US Constitution and restructure it according to the liberal desires of judges. This judge also loves murder—killing babies within the womb, shedding their innocent blood. He upholds the rights of sex offenders; he is an ACLU leader, a supporter of ACORN, etc. He hates and defies Christianity and wants any Bible-adhering voice silenced. He proudly uplifts Allah and Muslim rights.

Val Lee (1 John 5:10-13—the Bible)

Please watch:

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

EDITORIAL: Jesus, no, but yes to Allah


Senate Democrats are proving once again that no judicial nominee is too extreme for them to stomach. A move seems to be afoot to open debate on the Senate floor this week on the nomination of David Hamilton of Indiana to the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. This judge is a radical’s radical.

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, sent a letter on Friday to his fellow senators outlining his objections to Mr. Hamilton, who is a federal district judge. The senator first objected to Judge Hamilton’s stated belief that judges should effectively amend the Constitution – “writing footnotes to the Constitution,” the judge called it – through evolving case law. Second, Judge Hamilton has publicly and specifically embraced the president’s “empathy standard,” which even Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has now openly rejected.

Third, Judge Hamilton in many cases has shown an extreme hostility against innocuous expressions of religion in the public square. Mr. Sessions noted, though, that Judge Hamilton’s odd ruling in Hinrichs v. Bosma “prohibited prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives that expressly mentioned Jesus Christ … Yet he allowed prayers which mentioned Allah.”
Fourth, Mr. Sessions pointed out that “lawyers in the Almanac of the Federal Judiciary describe Judge Hamilton as one of the most lenient judges in his district on criminal matters,” including the case of a police officer who videotaped his own sexual encounters with two teenagers. The senator also objects to the judge’s extreme actions in blocking an “informed consent” law on abortion.

Finally, in light of the property rights movement stemming from the Supreme Court’s infamous Kelo decision, property rights advocates may want to take a close look at his representation of the city of Indianapolis in 1992 in Reel Pipe and Valve Co. V. City of Indianapolis, in which property owners were forced to sell property against their will to benefit other private “economic development.”

An Obama administration official has said the nomination is “a kind of signal” about the sorts of judges the president wants. In reviewing Judge Hamilton’s record, that signal should be seen as a red light warning senators to stop this nomination.
Office of the Press Secretary
President Obama Announces David Hamilton for the United States 7th Circuit Court of Appeals

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate Judge David Hamilton to the United States 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton has served for 14 years as a federal district judge in Indiana. He was appointed United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana in 1994 and was named Chief Judge in January of 2008.
President Obama said, “Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions. He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th circuit and I am extremely pleased to put him forward to serve the people of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin.”

Hamilton previously was an associate and then partner at the Indianapolis firm of Barnes & Thornburg and served as Counsel to then-Governor Evan Bayh of Indiana. Hamilton served as a member of the Indiana State Recount Commission and as chairman of the Indiana State Ethics Committee.

“I enthusiastically support the Senate confirmation of David Hamilton for U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Judge Hamilton has served the Southern District of Indiana with distinction as U.S. District Court Judge,” U.S. Sen. Dick Lugar said.

“I was proud to work side by side with Senator Lugar to recommend Judge Hamilton for this lifetime appointment,” said U.S. Senator Evan Bayh. “President Obama is right that Democrats and Republicans can work together to put highly qualified jurists on the federal bench. Judge Hamilton is an exceptional jurist who has demonstrated the highest ethical standards and a firm commitment to applying our country’s laws fairly.”

Hamilton is a graduate of Yale Law School and studied at the University of Tuebingen in Germany on a Fulbright scholarship. He is an emeritus member of the board of visitors of the Indiana University School of Law.

November 4, 2009 Posted by | Abortion, ACORN, Islam, Judge David Hamilton, Muslim, News, Obama, Pedophiles, Planned Parenthood, Politics, President Obama, Sex Offender, Uncategorized, White House | | 1 Comment

News 6.4.09—President Obama and Cairo University

Much is being reported in regards to President Obama’s speech at Cairo University—a bold outreach to “the Muslim World.” Unfortunately, not being  factually explained.

Quoting from the Koran four times, the President said, “Islam has always been a part of America’s story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco…let there be no doubt, Islam is a part of America.” Actually, it was Holland. On November 16,1776, officials at Saint Eustatius in the Dutch West Indies fired “the first salute” to a warship bearing the American flag.

President Obama also cited John Adams’ words when second president signed the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796. Adams stated we had “no enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims.” This presented a problem as the Barbary Pirates operating out of Tripoli continued to prey on American shipping. John Adams attempted to buy them off and failed. By 1800, nearly one-fifth of the federal budget was consumed in trying to pay off predatory rulers in North Africa. When Thomas Jefferson succeeded Adams in 1801, he dispatched warships and U.S. Marines “to the shores of Tripoli” to fight for American rights. Jefferson was determined not to pay tribute to the Muslim rulers of North Africa and to stop their seizing U.S. Merchant ships and selling American seamen into slavery. That effort succeeded.

Yes, Jefferson did own a copy of the Koran as President Obama stated in his speech. But the reason he read it when he was serving as our ambassador in Paris was to see if it could really be true–as Arab diplomats were telling him–that the Koran gave them the right to attack and enslave Americans and all other “infidels.” Jefferson concluded from his reading that America must fight–not pay tribute–to protect its citizens.

Koran: When the sacred months have passed away, THEN SLAY THE IDOLATERS WHEREVER YOU FIND THEM, AND TAKE THEM CAPTIVES AND BESIEGE THEM AND LIE IN WAIT FOR THEM IN EVERY AMBUSH, then if they repent and keep up prayer [become believers] and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them (9:5)


The Koran—more quotes:

As for those who disbelieve in Our communications, We shall make them enter fire; so oft as their skins are thoroughly burned, We will change them for other skins, that they may taste the punishment (4:56)

And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah (8:39)

FIGHT THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN ALLAH, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, NOR FOLLOW THE RELIGION OF TRUTH, OUT OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE BOOK [Christians and Jews], until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and THEY ARE IN A STATE OF SUBJECTION. (9:29)

I WILL CAST TERROR INTO THE HEARTS OF THOSE WHO DISBELIEVE. THEREFORE STRIKE OFF THEIR HEADS AND STRIKE OFF EVERY FINGERTIP OF THEM. THIS IS BECAUSE THEY ACTED ADVERSELY TO ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER; AND WHOEVER ACTS ADVERSELY TO ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER – THEN SURELY ALLAH IS SEVERE IN REQUITING (EVIL). THIS – TASTE IT, AND (KNOW) THAT FOR THE UNBELIEVERS IS THE PUNISHMENT OF FIRE. O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, then turn not your backs to them. And whoever shall turn his back to them on that day – unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company – then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath, and his abode is hell; and an evil destination shall it be. So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy) but it was Allah Who smote, and that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; (8:12-17)

And that you should judge between them by what Allah has revealed, and do not follow their low desires, and be cautious of them, lest they seduce you from part of what Allah has revealed to you; but if they turn back, then know that Allah desires to afflict them on account of some of their faults; and most surely many of the people are transgressors. Is it then the judgment of the times of ignorance that they desire: and who is better than Allah to judge for a people who are sure? O YOU WHO BELIEVE! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; THEY ARE FRIENDS OF EACH OTHER; AND WHOEVER AMONGST YOU TAKES THEM FOR A FRIEND, THEN SURELY HE IS ONE OF THEM; SURELY ALLAH DOES NOT GUIDE THE UNJUST PEOPLE. (5:49-51)

The punishment of those who pit themselves against Allah and His Messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement, except those who repent before you have them in your power (5:33-34)


Please read 1 John 5:10-13—the Bible

(Photo by Val Lee—Antigua)

June 5, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Israel, Muslim, News, Obama, Politics, President Obama, Uncategorized | , | Leave a comment

Hate Crime Legislative Facts—the Protection of Pedophiles

Please watch this disturbing legislative video exposure:

Joseph Duncan a homosexual/pedophile strove to obtain such rights as delivered in the Hate Crime Bill.  He believed he held the liberty to murder members of the Groene family in the name of sexual deviancy rights. He kidnapped the two young children, Dylan and Shasta. He rapped and murdered Dylan; fortunately, Shasta was rescued. He also kidnapped, sodomized and murdered a ten year old boy in California. He must be elated with the Hate Crime Bill.  

Due to this bill, Washington can intervene in just about any local or state crime. Because the bill doesn’t define the term “sexual orientation,” it appears pedophiles and practitioners of other bizarre sexual sins can claim protection. Democrats refused to amend the bill to explicitly exclude such “orientations.” If convicted, any American found guilty of a hate crime would face punishment above and beyond the original offense.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) tried to point out the ridiculousness of this caste system on the House floor yesterday. To the disgust of the homosexual crowd, she even took on the bill’s “martyr,” Matthew Shepard, whom the Left holds up as an example of why federal hate crimes must receive severer prosecution. The hate crimes bill that’s called the Matthew Shepard Bill is named after him though it has been proven his murder was not a result of a hate crime.  “It wasn’t because he was gay…” Rep. Foxx was referring to statements made to ABC’s 20/20 by the local authorities, who investigated the crime and stated that Shepard’s death was actually the result of drug abuse–not his homosexuality. The prosecutor who prosecuted these crimes stated that he never believed it was a hate crime. He believes it was a drug crime. Aaron McKinney, according to Aaron McKinney himself and to several other witnesses, was coming down from a five-day methamphetamine binge. He freely admits he not only used methamphetamine but also sold it. Five days up with no sleep, strung out on drugs, desperate to buy more, desperate to rob somebody to get money to buy more drugs. This was the motive, according to Aaron McKinney and the other witnesses. McKinney’s girlfriend and another friend of McKinney’s even claimed that McKinney himself has bisexual tendencies.

This resembles the lies that were presented to get baby murder legalized—through Rowe versus Wade.  Satan’s children will stop at nothing to get every vile thing legalized. They want God’s righteousness eliminated from American life. They do not fear the God who says liars are kept out of heaven.

Sexually wicked people have no morals and care only about self-fulfillment.  Harming others, including children, is not relevant on Capital Hill.  President Obama is having his heyday.    

God says a man and woman are to come together as virgins for a lifetime marriage commitment, forsaking all others.  All other activity is deviant. Yes, Jesus Christ forgives if true repentance is made, but sin can never be justified. (1 John 5:10-13—the Bible)

 More News:

 Islamic, Muslim Demographics—our frightfully changing world.

 Related videos:


May 1, 2009 Posted by | Hate Crime Bill, Islam, Muslim, News, Pedophiles, Politics, Religion, Sin, Terrorists, Uncategorized | | Leave a comment