Val Lee's Weblog

Val Lee's Writings


Dear Readers,

Time will tell what the future holds, but prayer is a necessity in times like these. Obama’s “change” has captured the young people.  

A friend described the response of citizens, mainly young, who gather to hear Obama “like a sea of people who are spellbound.”  Many people have drawn similarities between Obama and Hitler, even a couple of reporters who represent the national broadcasting media. People who have witnessed the crowds who surround Obama as those who are in hypnotic trance.


Remember, Obama and his church presented their yearly award to Louis Farrakhan (born Louis Eugene Walcott, May 11, 1933), whom they love dearly. Farrakhan is the National Representative of the Nation of Islam and Elijah Muhammad. This Muslim leader uplifts Hitler as a great man.  Http://  “…Here the Jews don’t like Farrakhan and so they call me ‘Hitler’. Well that’s a good name. Hitler was a very great man. He wasn’t great for me as a Black man but he was a great German and he rose Germany up from the ashes of her defeat by the united force of all of Europe and America after the First World War. Yet Hitler took Germany from the ashes and rose her up and made her the greatest fighting machine of the twentieth century, brothers and sisters, and even though Europe and America had deciphered the code that Hitler was using to speak to his chiefs of staff, they still had trouble defeating Hitler even after knowing his plans in advance. Now I’m not proud of Hitler’s evil toward Jewish people, but that’s a matter of record. He rose Germany up from nothing…”


Speaking to a crowd of 20,000 at a Saviours’ Day celebration in Chicago, Farrakhan declared that Obama represents “the hope of the entire world that America will change and be made better. “This young man is capturing audiences of black and brown and red and yellow,” the 74-year-old Farrakhan said. “If you look at Barack Obama’s audiences, and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed.” Farrakhan went on to compare Obama to the religion’s founder, Fard Muhammad, who was also bi-racial. “A black man with a white mother became a savior to us,” he said. “A black man with a white mother could turn out to be one who can lift America from her fall.”


Please remember as you read the below, Kenyan citizen, Hussein Obama, spent $1-million in US campaign funds to massacre 1,000 Christians in British Kenya, after his Communist, Marxist cousin lost the presidential election. 800 Christian churches were arsoned, with dozens of people cooked alive. Men and women were raped by Obama supporters. To stop the violence, the Kenyan government was extorted by Obama to make his cousin “prime minister,” a job that did not formerly exist.  

Sadly, Obama did not desire that his cousin be sentenced to death for his murdering rampage.  Remember, Nero burned Christians and his same spirit seems to rest in Obama who does not care that a 1,000 Christians were incinerated by his cousin’s hand. He does not care that millions of innocent unborn babies have been burned to death through saline solution burning. This blood is on his hands too as he has legislated abortion.  He also has slain babies after they are born through legislation; approving of their killing as being unwanted at birth. The Bible tells us in Proverbs chapter six that God hates six things. One of the six is hands that shed innocent blood.

Val Lee
Interesting Web Article:


Barack the Black Hitler Article:


Barack the Black Hitler: How Obama’s stated goals may lead to the deaths of roughly six million people and the striking similarities between Obama’s personality and methods for acquiring power and Hitler’s.


For most people, Hitler embodies pure evil. Because of this, his name is often invoked in debates over character. These sorts of comparisons are almost always unwarranted and wildly exaggerated. But now America has a new star politician, Obama, and the parallels between he and the most loathed man in history are very real. In this article, we will examine the methods of assuming power employed by both men, and the role of their decisions in the lives (and deaths) of six millions Jews.


The substance behind words:


We can tell a lot about what a politician thinks of his audience based on his approach to speaking to them. A politician that believes his audience is mature and intelligent will appeal to their logic rather than emotion. He will tell them the unpleasant truth because he believes his audience can handle it. A politician that does not think very highly of his audience will do the opposite. He will remain as vague as possible and appeal to their emotions above all else.


“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”

— Adolf Hitler


It is not hard to deduce Obama’s opinions of his audience. When he’s in public he uses vague terms such as “hope” and “change” rather than attempt to define exactly what it is he intends to do. He appeals to the authority of examples in history in order to imbue their qualities into his words rather than extoll the virtues of any specific policy he proposes. Let’s not forget his creative “borrowing” of other people’s words either. (see: Deval Patrick) In essence, he aims to inspire, not inform.

“I use emotion for the many and reserve reason for the few.”

— Adolf Hitler


Behind closed doors, however, Obama shows another side to him as he attempts social psychoanalysis on the people whose votes he seeks: “[People in small towns] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy towards people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
— Obama, at a
San Francisco fundraiser. (Behind closed doors) Insults and condescension aside, what is wrong with this picture? Why doesn’t Obama share his amatuer psychoanalyst-side with the rest of the people? Surely a great orator as Obama can do it without insulting them, right? It would be impressive for Obama to tell the American people exactly what they’re thinking (as he seems to think himself capable of doing), but it appears he doesn’t seem to think highly enough of voters to tell them what he thinks, only what he wants them to feel.


Tactics for seizing control:


“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”
— Adolf Hitler


Its no big secret that Obama basis most of his appeal with youth voters. This is a common occurrence in the history of the rise of tyrants. Most are supported fervently by the young. Hitler famously used this technique to gain power. The tyrant-to-be must hide his true ambitions behind a mask of emotional appeal in order to seduce the gullible and unwary. The youth most often falls into this category, not yet “broken in” to the number one rule in electing a ruler: watch their actions, not their lips.


“The leader of genius must have the ability to make different opponents appear as if they belonged to one category.”
— Adolf Hitler


In the years to follow, McCain became a vocal critic of the management of the Iraq war. When the blueprints for the Surge rolled out, he was one of the first to embrace it while rejecting the Bush doctrine. He has also been critical of the wasteful spending which the administration allowed and even its tax cuts. He earned the scorn of a lot of Republican leaders for this, as well as his “maverick” handle from the media, seeing him as a thorn in the administration’s side. Despite their many differences and long history of rivalry, Obama attempts to caricature McCain as essentially a Bush-clone in many of his speeches.


“No matter what the costs, no matter what the consequences, John McCain seems determined to carry out a third Bush term…”

— Barack Obama

Returning to the subject of Obama’s views of voters, what do you think this tells us about Obama? Surely the people must know Bush’s policies, they’ve been the law of the land for nearly eight years. Surely, any voter interested in the issues would study the policies of the candidates carefully. If one candidate’s policies were identical to the current administration’s, wouldn’t it be readily obvious even to the most untrained eye? Why would the average voter need Obama to tell them that Bush and McCain are the same person if its obvious? Only if they wouldn’t get that impression from looking at the record, only if it weren’t true.


“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”
— Adolf Hitler


(For the sake of accuracy, it should be noted that a version of this quote first originated with Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister. In this particular quote, Hitler was paraphrasing him.)


“Sooner will a camel pass through a needle’s eye than a great man be “discovered” by an election.”

— Adolf Hitler

January 2nd, 1996, Obama began his under-handed crusade for the senate. With a crack team of lawyers, he challenged hundreds of vote petitions and managed to eliminate all of his fellow Democrats from the ballot. One fellow candidate was Alice Palmer. Up to that point, she had been grooming Obama to succeed her once she retired. Not willing to wait, Obama took matters into his own hands and denied her the right to run for her own seat. Alice Palmer is the same woman who essentially launched his political career. Apparently, Obama didn’t trust the voters to “discover” a great man in that election, so he chose for them.


The genes of tyranny:

Obama and Hitler both have displayed a penchant for eliminating “undesirable” infants. Hitler’s case is well known; he believed he could create a master race through selective breeding, mandatory sterilization of “undesirable parents” and abortions. Obama’s methods lack the scope of ambition but the end result is similar – Obama has legalized the murder of already-born infants.


In 2002, an important bill known as the “Induced Infant Liability Act” cropped up in the Illinois senate. The purpose of the bill was to protect infants who had been born alive after a failed abortion from being “aborted” after birth. In the United States, the second a person is born, they become a U.S. citizen. Taking the life of such a citizen is murder. That is something both pro-choice and pro-life advocates can agree on. Even the most pro-abortion lobby in the country, NARAL, did not oppose it nor the federal version of the law.


Obama on the other hand, did oppose it, TWICE. In doing so, he helped establish the legality of murder of infant Americans in his state.


Both Obama and Hitler are of mixed racial heritage, and distort this heritage to control public opinion. Hitler hated jews and made a career of it, so he hid the fact that jewish blood ran through his veins. Obama has made a career out of embracing his “blackness” and African American heritage. His first book, “Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance”, was based entirely on that premise. There’s just one problem: Obama isn’t an African American, Obama is an Arab American.


Obama is 50% caucasian, 43.75% arab, and 6.25% black. According to federal law, an American citizen must be at least 1/8th, or 12.5% of a particular race to be considered a member of that race. Obama meets that criteria easily to be considered an Arab American but not African American.

(The astute reader will have noticed that being that Obama is not truly African American, the title of this article is inaccurate. I have decided upon that title rather than an alternative due to the public’s general familiarity with Obama as an “African American”.)

Dead-end philosophy:


Pop Quiz: Which of these quotes was said by Hitler and which was said by Obama?

A. “…our individual salvation depends on collective salvation. Because thinking only about yourself, fulfilling your immediate wants and needs, betrays a poverty of ambition.”


B. “Our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.”


If these two statements seem similar, it’s because they both derive from the same philosophy: socialism. NAZI stands for “National Socialist German Workers’ Party”. The socialists of Hitler’s era aren’t much different from those of today in terms of ideology, though most socialists of the modern era are called “latte liberals”. Indeed, Hitler would’ve fit right in with such a group. He was a vegetarian, pro-abortion, an advocate for strict gun control, desirous of universal health care, and continually extolling the virtues of state control.


Someone once asked me how Obama could become a socialist. I replied by asking how he could not. Obama has been surrounded by marxists his entire life. I’m not sure that he has contacted non-marxist/socialist ideas within his close circle of friends even once.

His father was a communist. His mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist. Obama explicitly admits to seeking out marxist professors in his autobiographical work and attending socialist meetings. His close friends, like Bill Ayers the former terrorist, leadership at Trinity, all hold distinctly socialist/marxist views. Obama had the most left-wing voting record in the entire senate for 2007. He was even more radical than senators who were openly socialist.


In this particular Obama lie, Obama portrays himself as a champion of the people, taking up their concerns and confronting special interests run amok. Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.


Full article here:

What is also particularly troubling is our press’s unwillingness to ask Obama the sorts of questions to expose these falsehoods. The above New York Times article is something of an exception, you’ll notice it is dated February 3, before they became shills for Obama. Indeed, in the rare instances in which Obama has been confronted with questions regarding his deceptions or questionable ties, he responds by fleeing – literally.


“The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.”
— Adolf Hitler

For a fairly extensive list of Obama lies, try this compilation:


Hitler’s antisemitism is well documented. But what of Obama’s? In the 1930’s, Hitler ran on a platform that included open antisemitism. At that time and place, it was politically viable to do so. In the modern era and in the U.S., it is not viable to be openly opposed to any race, including jews. Nevertheless, Obama has knowingly jeapordized his chances for the presidency by willfully associating himself with countless antisemites: Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, Samantha Powers, Robert Malley, Bill Ayers, Louis Farrakhan, El-Hady, etc. Some of his own advisors have called for the U.S. to cut off funding to Israel, have been caught negotiating with known islamic extremist groups, and have expressed sympathy and praise for Hamas. There appears to be only two conclusions we can reach from this:


A. Obama is antisemitic but hides it from voters.

B. Obama is incredibly tolerant of antisemitism.


Regardless of Obama’s true feelings, this sort of approach to something as poisonous as racism is disturbing and dangerous. “Obama has taken no steps to moderate his church’s anti-Israel invective. Obama’s affiliation with Wright aligns with his choice of financial backers and foreign policy advisors. To varying degrees, all of them exhibit hostility towards Israel and support for appeasing jihadists.”

Jerusalem Post.

The second coming of the holocaust:

History repeats:

Pop Quiz 2. Name this leader:

The nation was in shambles. A previous ruler had led the country into an unnecessary war, the economy was failing, and a sense of depression filled the air. Then, a new leader emerged. He was a powerful speaker, offering hope, change, and a fix to the economy. He wrote two books about his experiences and used his literary work to propel him to success. He was an open christian with some muslim friends. He called for unity and considered himself an advocate of peace. Some of his political opponents cast him as naive and inexperienced. He also had alot of radical ties, but the media, and ultimately the voters, were willing to overlook that. Who is he? The answer is Hitler. It’s something of a trick question, because nothing in the characteristics of the above described character bear any distinction between Obama and Hitler.


Different strokes:

This article has put a great deal of focus on the similarities between Hitler and Obama, and they are indeed numerous. Indeed, I never even got around to most of it, such as the Hitler/Obama muslim connection, or gestures they share in their oratory, or even much depth into their shared views of socialism. (I will discuss Obama’s socialist/marxist views at length in a later post.) An encyclopedia could be written documenting the parallels.


However, I’d like to take a moment to discuss the differences. For one thing, Hitler was competent. Hitler was also quite bold, while I doubt anyone would ever accuse Obama of personal courage. He also invaded much of Europe, while Obama seems content with merely socializing the U.S. and watching a new holocaust unfold.


In other areas, Obama shares greater similarities to other past leaders. For example, his economic policies are very similar to that of President Hoover, the man credited with essentially causing (or at least worsening) the Great Depression. They are both economic isolationists and protectionistic to the core. He also draws a parallel to Neville Chamberlin, who famously attempted to appease Hitler, in terms of foreign policy. In fact, for any student of history, it would appear that Obama sifted through a history book, collected all of the worst traits and policies of leaders past, then compiled them to make the bedrock of his campaign.


The irony of all this is that it looks as though Obama was honest about one thing – he will bring change. If history is any guide, we can expect his sort of change to contain the mores of Marx, the political ambition of Hitler, the foreign policy of Neville Chamberlin, and the economics of Hoover. It’s a change that looks remarkably the same. It’s a change that, if implemented, could alter this country into something so destitute, so diminished, so destroyed, so devoid of any signs of its origin, that none of us may even recognize it.

If you want change in 2008, and lots of it, vote for Obama. It may be the last vote you ever cast.

Hitler came to power during the Great Depression, similar to our current economic crisis. Hitler’s was a political platform of “change”, and look where it lead Germany. He came into power by energizing Germany’s youth movement – the “brown shirts” (same with Obama, and groups called the “blue shirts”), Hitler was not raised in the country that he aspired to rule (same with Obama), Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf”, his autobiography which described his political leanings (Obama wrote his own autobiography with similar features), Hitler was a brilliant speaker who could move masses with his rhetoric (same with Obama), Hitler bought his way into power and used all media sources available to over saturate society with his “change” message (same with Obama), Hitler was also a great proponant of gun control (as is Obama). A disarmed populace is easy to subject. Hitler changed the German national emblem to one more personal to he and his Nazi Party (Obama did the same thing with his “O” symbol, remember his plane?). Desperate people in desperate situations will accept anything they are told and will move in whatever direction a well spoken, charismatic leader will take the, regardless of whether it destroys their way of life or not. I encourage each and every person reading this to do the research for yourself. We are in deep trouble if we let history repeat itself, this time in America! White, Christian Americans beware….we are the targets of the next Holocaust if Obama gets in office! You’d better press your burkas and brush up on your Farsi! Lord, please rid of our enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!


Blog comments:


My thoughts of Obama being like Hitler first came when I watched this video called “We Are the Ones.” If you go to YouTube and type that in, you can see it. It’s a video of Obama supporters all Hollywood people- chanting “O-bam-a, O-bam-a” as they sing and praise him. After I watch it, I cannot get that chanting out of my head! If you close your eyes, and just listen to the crowds chanting his name… you’d really think you were in Nazi Germany. Also, I am disturbed by his stupid symbol… that round thing with the stripes and sun. Also, the way he’s often got these rays of sunlight behind his head in some of his posters, etc. Why does he have that symbol? If he is elected, is that going to be our new U.S. Symbol?? But the media/Hollywood and his supporters (the crowds where people faint and he says things about healing the planets… remind me much of Hitler. People love Obama because he stirs them up… he gets them excited, he makes them think that they are all going to change the world, he looks and talks good and delivers umpteen million promises all aimed at individual greed and most of which there is NO WAY he’ll be able to deliver… at least not without hurting this nation.

November 21, 2008 Posted by | History, Hitler, Islam, Muslim, News, Obama, Politics, Terrorists, Uncategorized | , , , | 3 Comments