President Obama’s Pro Sex offender Judicial Nominee

Dear Readers,

 http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

I implore you to please take the time to contact your senators through the above link regarding Judge David Hamilton who our president desires to appoint to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals this week.

This man is dreadfully vile, and wicked! He uplifts the unlawful position to change our US Constitution and restructure it according to the liberal desires of judges. This judge also loves murder—killing babies within the womb, shedding their innocent blood. He upholds the rights of sex offenders; he is an ACLU leader, a supporter of ACORN, etc. He hates and defies Christianity and wants any Bible-adhering voice silenced. He proudly uplifts Allah and Muslim rights.

Val Lee (1 John 5:10-13—the Bible)

Please watch:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy_z107XR7g
________

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

EDITORIAL: Jesus, no, but yes to Allah

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Senate Democrats are proving once again that no judicial nominee is too extreme for them to stomach. A move seems to be afoot to open debate on the Senate floor this week on the nomination of David Hamilton of Indiana to the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. This judge is a radical’s radical.
Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, sent a letter on Friday to his fellow senators outlining his objections to Mr. Hamilton, who is a federal district judge. The senator first objected to Judge Hamilton’s stated belief that judges should effectively amend the Constitution – “writing footnotes to the Constitution,” the judge called it – through evolving case law. Second, Judge Hamilton has publicly and specifically embraced the president’s “empathy standard,” which even Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has now openly rejected.

Third, Judge Hamilton in many cases has shown an extreme hostility against innocuous expressions of religion in the public square. Mr. Sessions noted, though, that Judge Hamilton’s odd ruling in Hinrichs v. Bosma “prohibited prayers in the Indiana House of Representatives that expressly mentioned Jesus Christ … Yet he allowed prayers which mentioned Allah.”
Fourth, Mr. Sessions pointed out that “lawyers in the Almanac of the Federal Judiciary describe Judge Hamilton as one of the most lenient judges in his district on criminal matters,” including the case of a police officer who videotaped his own sexual encounters with two teenagers. The senator also objects to the judge’s extreme actions in blocking an “informed consent” law on abortion.

Finally, in light of the property rights movement stemming from the Supreme Court’s infamous Kelo decision, property rights advocates may want to take a close look at his representation of the city of Indianapolis in 1992 in Reel Pipe and Valve Co. V. City of Indianapolis, in which property owners were forced to sell property against their will to benefit other private “economic development.”

An Obama administration official has said the nomination is “a kind of signal” about the sorts of judges the president wants. In reviewing Judge Hamilton’s record, that signal should be seen as a red light warning senators to stop this nomination.
___________

 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Announces-David-Hamilton-for-the-United-States-7th-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals/
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_______________________________________________
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 17, 2009
President Obama Announces David Hamilton for the United States 7th Circuit Court of Appeals

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate Judge David Hamilton to the United States 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton has served for 14 years as a federal district judge in Indiana. He was appointed United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana in 1994 and was named Chief Judge in January of 2008.
President Obama said, “Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions. He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th circuit and I am extremely pleased to put him forward to serve the people of Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin.”
Hamilton previously was an associate and then partner at the Indianapolis firm of Barnes & Thornburg and served as Counsel to then-Governor Evan Bayh of Indiana. Hamilton served as a member of the Indiana State Recount Commission and as chairman of the Indiana State Ethics Committee.

“I enthusiastically support the Senate confirmation of David Hamilton for U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Judge Hamilton has served the Southern District of Indiana with distinction as U.S. District Court Judge,” U.S. Sen. Dick Lugar said.

“I was proud to work side by side with Senator Lugar to recommend Judge Hamilton for this lifetime appointment,” said U.S. Senator Evan Bayh. “President Obama is right that Democrats and Republicans can work together to put highly qualified jurists on the federal bench. Judge Hamilton is an exceptional jurist who has demonstrated the highest ethical standards and a firm commitment to applying our country’s laws fairly.”

Hamilton is a graduate of Yale Law School and studied at the University of Tuebingen in Germany on a Fulbright scholarship. He is an emeritus member of the board of visitors of the Indiana University School of Law.

Newsweek Article—It is Legitimate to Kill Granny

 

 

 

 

The Case for Killing Granny

 

 

I must tell you, I was quite disturbed to read the article, “The Case for Killing Granny,” in my father-in-law’s copy of Newsweek, dated September 21, 2009. This written defense was completely pro President Obama and his desire to NOT prolong the lives of the elderly and help save our government megabucks.  It spoke to our president and how he has informed us that the elderly take a large slice of our revenue. If we don’t spend our money on seniors, we can have more money, according to the article, which is obviously reinforcing our president’s stands.  It’s ok to divvy credit so people can own better cars and to assist Planned Parenthood, ACORN, etc…but don’t spend it on the aged.  Spend outrageous amounts of money keeping murderers alive, but kill innocent Granny.

 

This article also informs us that health care has to be rationed! So who do we ration? Those who can’t argue—those with little or no voice. This includes those classified in the area of special medical needs. Our present administration is very callous to those people they believe should have been aborted because they did not arrive perfect in form.  Those who own the best quality of life are those who deserve life, this appears to be today’s socialist/Marxist motto. 

 

The Bible speaks of the wicked seeking to kill the innocent (Psalm 10:8-9) and that is the platform of our government administration. They want to kill the defenseless—unborn babies and the elderly. Christians certainly need to be in prayer for people in leadership to accept Christ as their Savior, and for justice to reign in our land. 

 

 Val Lee (1 John 5:10-13—the Bible)

 

ACORN in the News Again and President Obama’s Birth Place is going to the Bench—September 2009

          

 

Good and Bad News:

On September 14, 2009, the US Senate voted 83-7 to accept an amendment offered by Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) which prevents the “Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now” (ACORN) from receiving federal funding within the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill now being considered on the Senate floor.

ACORN is an organization held close to the heart of the Democratic Party. However, videos posted on YouTube exposing ACORN giving advice to independent undercover investigators—one posing as a female prostitute and the other as her pimp, has turned the tide. ACORN gave approving counsel regarding their illegal activities, including trafficking into our country child prostitutes from El Salvador. The ACORN staff had these two cover-up agents sign-up with ACORN for government assistance in the name of lying deception. 

To the dismay of law abiding citizens, this vile organization remains eligible for billions in other appropriations! Not only from appropriations but from President Obama’s stimulus bill. “Acorn received $1.6 million to provide housing assistance in its current fiscal year”—http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125298410509811027.HTML Wall Street Journal, September 15, 2009.

Remember, ACORN forged votes for Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkZrMpv0Pss 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuEHljjhjyk&feature=PlayList&p=3064B50F4F59971C&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=59

White House defense: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6DgWjbmfoU&feature=related

The president denies connection with ACORN but he was connected. Project Vote and ACORN share the same office. Please watch video and see their ads. This all deals with deception:  

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obama_lies_claims_he_never_worked_for_acorn/

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/acornproject_vote_voting_drive.HTML

From Project Vote’s website:

http://www.projectvote.org/newsreleases/439-project-vote-and-ACLU-file-acorn-lawsuit-challenging-constitutionality-of-Pennsylvania-voter-registration-law-.HTML

“July 22, 2009  PITTSBURGH – The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and Project Vote filed a lawsuit today on behalf of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a community organization comprising more than 20,000 working families in Pennsylvania that utilizes voter-engagement strategies, like voter-registration campaigns, as part of its work to strengthen low- and moderate-income communities.  The lawsuit charges that a Pennsylvania law unconstitutionally restricts ACORN’s right to conduct voter-registration drives by effectively prohibiting it from using paid canvassers…  

Since 1970, ACORN has been one of the country’s most influential advocates on social and economic justice issues for low- to moderate-income people. Voter registration has been an important part of ACORN’s ongoing efforts to empower people in poor and minority communities.  For more on ACORN, go to www.acorn.org.” 

_______  

“ACORN uses these fundamentals in order to harass, manipulate and ultimately extort money from powerful people and organizations. Their tactics… identify, isolate, freeze and escalate. The blue print works like this. ACORN will identify an individual, usually a powerful head of a powerful organization. They will show up in front of that person’s home with several hundred protestors. Since these powerful folks normally live in quiet and wealthy suburbs, such a commotion will soon be the talk of the neighborhood. The message for this person’s friends and neighbors will be clear “they are a bad person”. By doing so, they will have isolated this person from their friends and neighbors. Soon, not only will the target themselves be a pariah but so will their children. That is the process of isolation. At this point, the target thinks that things can’t get worse, and it is then that ACORN only raises the stakes. Not only will ACORN, and their protestors, show up everywhere the target frequents: the mall, the movie theater, the library, etc, but they will be there before the target even shows up. As such, before the target even arrives to their shopping, ACORN will show up with a crew of several hundred to protest them.

Similar tactics to the ones employed to extort H&R Block were also used in the case of firms like Sherwin Williams and S.I.F.M.A. Just recently, ACORN began a campaign of protesting Wachovia. ACORN already has an agreement with Wells Fargo, in which Wells pays off ACORN in order to be left alone. Wells soon after bought out Wachovia, and so this tactic was made mostly as a message to WF to make sure that they continue with their agreement.”  Wells Fargo defense with facts: http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/06-28-2004/0002201229&EDATE=

God is an exposing God who declares make sure your sins will find you out!

What is to become of us as a nation when Congress does not desire to stop funding criminal organizations unless they are caught on video or disclosed by those who testify to the facts. May our LORD Jesus Christ come quickly!  He will eliminate every evil way from the face of the earth. He will rule in holy chastity and in all righteous truth. He never lies nor does His holy Word, the Bible. (See 1 John 5:10-13—the Bible) 

_______________________

 

Defining the President’s 36-100 Czars—Exact Count a Quandary 

 

WASHINGTON —President Obama announced the creation of a “Czar czar” to oversee the officials he has appointed as czars since taking office. “There are so many people running around the White House who have not gone through any vetting whatsoever that I think it’s important for me to appoint a czar just to keep track of them.

 

Not one single czar has been approved by congress.

 

“…naming of Border Czar Alan Bersin, the Obama administration has by any reasonable reckoning passed the Romanov Dynasty in the production of czars. The Romanovs ruled Russia from 1613 with the ascension of Michael I through the abdication of Czar Nicholas II in 1917. During that time, they produced 18 czars…”  David Rothkopf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mumm8-V3s44&feature=related

 

_______________________

 

Time should tell if President Obama was born in the US or in Kenya

 

Interesting videos:

 

Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h68zmj726×0&feature=PlayList&p=7C9E24E3330970EB&index=1

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1H7nIB9WNc&feature=PlayList&p=7C9E24E3330970EB&index=3

 

BORN IN THE USA?

 

Consendensed article:
Judge orders trial on eligibility issue
Arguments planned Jan. 11 for major Obama challenge

---

Posted: September 08, 2009
4:42 PM Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A California judge today tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

If the case actually goes to arguments before U.S. District Judge David Carter, it will be the first time the merits of the dispute have been argued in open court, according to one of the attorneys working on the issue.

In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party’s chairman, also were restored to the case.

The case would be the first time, according to Kreep, that the actual merits of the dispute will have been heard in open court. A multitude of such disputes have been rejected out of hand by various state and federal courts. Even the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly has rejected urgent appeals to hear the evidence.

The suit alleges Obama is actually a citizen of Indonesia and “possibly still citizen of Kenya, usurping the position of the president of the United States of America and the commander-in-chief.”

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama’s American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama’s citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama’s decision to spend sums estimated over $1 million to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest the questions.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

“It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for president can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” wrote Assistant U.S. Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute. “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.”

President Obama’s defenders also said they would file a motion seeking to block any discovery of evidence at this point.

But among the issues that appear to be looming is a claim that Obama’s actual birth certificate from Kenya has emerged.

As WND reported over the holiday weekend, Lucas Smith, the man who tried to sell an alleged Barack Obama Kenyan birth certificate on eBay, filed court papers insisting – under threat of perjury – that the Obama birth certificate in his possession is the genuine article.

The document above is alleged by Lucas Smith to be Barack Obama’s original, authentic birth certificate from Kenya.

 

Taitz stated, “The true and correct photocopy of the birth certificate obtained is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A,” the declaration reads. “I declare, certify, verify, state and affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing statements of fact and descriptions of circumstances and events are true and correct.” …